WHEN WHERE HOW

From the understanding days of LCM s and HCFs we came across the points that two persons with different steps count per minute can reach same place after a same period of time arises the question that they have different step sizes too.The multiplicative behaviors are so inharent in these two entities, STEP SIZES and STEP TIMING that , both LCM and HCF are nothing but intermingled forms of multiplications and divisions of some numbers. When two people wants to meet , there needs a communication and all these three words WHEN ,HOW and WHERE are to come if there is any ambiguity regarding some factors.Atleast two of these are to become sure such that they can meet each other.If any one of them does not know how to reach that place or how to attain that time , there is again the problem of disambiguity. So all these three questions are necessary for two or more things are to occur parallelly and to continue parallelly upto a certain period of time. Now suppose a world where these three words are missing .Suppose in that world these three words are not available in any of the languages then it means no one meets each other in that world. Or otherwise if people meets each other , then there is no planning to do so.All meets others on a dependence of mere chance.So from these conclusions it is very much sure that to attain a deterministic purpose you have to follow a standard scale for every thing living there to count upon you.The counter is not necessarily a living entity , it can have a system in that.Its a different question to consider any system as a living kind of entity which we will discuss in some other special topic ahead. Now we can suppose the world where any two of these are missing and we will examing the nature of that world in that case with linguistic behaviours and the nature of the system how that behave and the constraints in the system for the missingness of certain words. It naturally comes in mind how can some words remain missing in some languages or in some of the worlds where other relevant word is strongly present.By the term relevan word we here mean a situation that if peoples in that world know the word WHEN , did they never asked the question WHERE? Obviously a person asks WHEN , must have asked WHERE.(Obviously no one is thinking that in that world WHEN=tkgrfo and WHERE=rgkflr can happen but no we are concerend about the fact that no such words tkgrfo to mean WHEN nor such word rgkflr to mean WHERE even exist in that world.Our concern is there.) Another concern here is the nature of the monitor who monitors all along the tasks the autodeciding entities perform all along the line of actions.The society where the WORDS WHEN is never used have never used the word CLOCK or the word WATCH.Dont you think so? The world where agents have never used the term WHERE have never found the difference between two places , either they are so fast movers that they can remin every where all at once that is all the agents are unanimous or are never movers that is all agents remain static all along their life.Or it is very much possible that they speak in some form of waves that can move in different encrypted channels and transmits upto a very long distance. So the nature of words we use are entirely dependent on the kind of facilities that we have or need. Yes obviously we have found the cases in anthropology that whenever any newer version of facility appears in the mankind which overkills the previous and era long traditional features , so many words related to that traditional facilities blurrs out of human uses.Our concern is to categorise the coharentness of these words groups and which kind of words relates how much to what kind of facilities in the mankind.Not only the facilities alternations or the changes in tastes of users of words (speakers,communicators , editors,every one) kill the words , there exists some other reasons for this.Sometimes some words appear that fits better for the true nature of the situations that was not properly fitting the sense with the words previously used for. The words with various senses and has the positional values along the sentences or along the lines of contexts are not that much stable words.